What Value LTAD 2.0 Brings to the Table

Six reasons enterprises use LTAD 2.0 before making critical Data & AI commitments

40%

Cost Reduction

Avoid paying for unused platform features

3x

Wider Visibility

See tools beyond analyst shortlists

60%

Faster Discovery

Shorter evaluation cycles with curated insights

5x

ROI Potential

Right-fit tools deliver more value per dollar

See Beyond the Obvious

Access high-quality Data & AI tools that never appear in analyst reports or vendor shortlists.

Decide with Confidence

Make choices backed by full market awareness, not partial visibility or vendor familiarity.

Reduce Cost & Risk

Avoid overpaying for bloated platforms and reduce long-term vendor lock-in.

Faster Time to Value

Skip months of discovery. Start with curated, right-fit solutions from day one.

Stay Flexible

Preserve architectural freedom by knowing your options before commitments are made.

Neutral & Trustworthy

Independent, practitioner-led insights, not influenced by vendor sponsorship or marketing.

01

Problem Statement

Partial Visibility Leads to Predictable Mistakes

The Visibility Problem Enterprises Rarely Acknowledge

Enterprises do not lack access to Data & AI tools.

They lack visibility into the full market.

In practice, most organizations evaluate only a narrow subset of vendors, typically those already visible through analyst reports, existing vendor relationships, or internal familiarity. This creates a structural bias in how Data & AI decisions are made.

As a result, many high-quality, enterprise-ready tools never enter evaluation, not because they are weak, but because they are invisible at the point decisions are formed.

How LTAD 2.0 Enriches Gartner, Forrester & Other Market Surveys

The yellow and green dots represent niche, high-quality products made visible by LTAD 2.0, tools that traditional analyst frameworks rarely surface.

Gartner Magic Quadrant for Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms

Gartner Magic Quadrant: Data Science & ML Platforms (April 2025)

Forrester Wave - Data Management For Analytics Platforms

Forrester Wave: Data Management for Analytics (Q2 2025)

What They Show

Gartner & Forrester apply strict eligibility criteria. Vendors often need:

  • Enterprise implementations across multiple geographies
  • Revenue thresholds and funding stability
  • Broad feature sets, not just single capabilities

This means startups and smaller vendors rarely qualify, even if they excel at solving a real business problem.

What Gets Missed

The green and yellow dots on these charts represent companies that:

  • Don't meet Gartner or Forrester eligibility criteria (scale, revenue, breadth)
  • Are often single-feature specialists that solve problems faster and cheaper
  • Stay invisible to enterprise buyers despite being enterprise-ready
What LTAD 2.0 Makes Visible

We extend the horizon by making these hidden players visible:

  • Connecting niche, high-quality startups and SME vendors
  • Pre-vetting for enterprise readiness
  • Bringing them directly to enterprise buyers for evaluation

Smaller vendors with laser-focused solutions could solve the pain point at a fraction of the cost.

The Consequence

Customers default to "Leaders" and pay for large, complex platforms. On average, only 30–40% of features are ever used, but enterprises pay for 100%.

Meanwhile, smaller vendors with laser-focused solutions could solve the pain point at a fraction of the cost, but never make it onto the radar.

Why This Happens

Industry analyst frameworks such as Gartner and Forrester play an important role in enterprise decision-making, but they operate under strict eligibility criteria.

Vendors typically need to demonstrate:

1
Multiple enterprise implementations across geographies
2
Revenue scale and funding stability
3
Broad feature coverage rather than focused capabilities
4
Recognition through surveys and existing analyst visibility

This model works well for identifying established platforms.

It does not work well for surfacing specialized, fast-moving, single-capability tools, even when those tools solve real business problems more efficiently.

Pattern

The Resulting Pattern

1
Enterprises default to "leaders" they already know
2
Evaluation shortlists shrink before real comparison begins
3
Decisions are made with partial market awareness

This is not a failure of due diligence.

It is a visibility constraint baked into the system.

And when visibility is constrained, outcomes become predictable.

02

The Consequence

Cost, Lock-In, and Regret

What Happens When the Visibility Gap Goes Unaddressed

When enterprises make Data & AI decisions with partial market visibility, the consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time.

What begins as a "safe" choice often becomes a long-term constraint.

The Predictable Outcomes

01

Overbuying Complex Platforms

Organizations default to large, all-in-one platforms to "cover all bases." In reality, only 30–40% of features are ever used, yet enterprises pay for 100%, year after year.

02

Vendor Lock-In

Multi-year contracts and proprietary architectures reduce flexibility. Changing direction later becomes expensive, slow, and politically difficult, even when better options emerge.

03

Growing Technical Debt

Misfit tools lead to workarounds, manual processes, and brittle integrations. Complexity increases, while agility decreases.

04

Innovation Lag

While competitors adopt specialized, right-fit tools and move faster, organizations locked into heavyweight platforms struggle to adapt.

05

Higher Total Cost of Ownership

Licensing, integration, customization, and ongoing maintenance costs quietly exceed initial projections, without proportional business value.

Core Issue

These outcomes are rarely caused by poor intent or lack of expertise.

They are the result of decisions made without full visibility into the market.

Once those decisions are locked in, reversing them becomes far more costly than making them correctly in the first place.

03

The Solution

LTAD 2.0: What We Do Differently

Extending the Enterprise Horizon

LTAD 2.0 exists to solve a very specific problem:

Enterprises make long-term Data & AI commitments while seeing only a fraction of the available market.

LTAD 2.0 extends that horizon.

Instead of relying solely on analyst shortlists, incumbent vendors, or internal familiarity, LTAD 2.0 provides structured visibility into niche, high-quality Data & AI tools that are typically invisible at the point where decisions are shaped.

These tools are not experimental curiosities.

They are often single-capability specialists, built to solve focused problems faster, with less complexity, and at a lower long-term cost.

What Makes LTAD 2.0 Different

Not a marketplace
Not a vendor directory
Not vendor-driven

It functions as a strategic visibility and decision layer, designed to support enterprises before they commit to platforms, architectures, or long-term contracts.

What LTAD 2.0 provides:

1
Visibility into niche and emerging tools that rarely surface in enterprise evaluations
2
Context around where these tools fit, and where they do not
3
A broader, more balanced starting point for R&D, architecture, and procurement

The objective is not to replace large platforms, but to ensure enterprises choose deliberately, with awareness of credible alternatives and trade-offs.

Transformation

The Shift LTAD 2.0 Enables

From:

  • Defaulting to familiar vendors
  • Over-engineering to "play it safe"
  • Paying for breadth that is never used

To:

  • Evaluating right-fit solutions with clarity
  • Preserving architectural flexibility
  • Making decisions with lower long-term regret

LTAD 2.0 helps organizations see more clearly before committing, when choices are still easy to change.

04

When to Use

Where LTAD 2.0 Fits in the Enterprise Decision Flow

Use LTAD 2.0 Before Decisions Become Difficult to Reverse

Timing Matters

LTAD 2.0 is designed to be used early, at the moments when Data & AI decisions are still flexible, low-risk, and open to influence.

Once platforms are standardized, contracts signed, or architectures locked in, visibility comes too late.

Typical Decision Moments Where LTAD 2.0 Adds Value

1

Platform Standardization

See credible alternatives before committing to a single vendor stack.

2

Architecture Definition

Broaden the option space. Prevent over-engineering.

3

R&D & Evaluation

Curated starting point aligned to real requirements.

4

Procurement Shortlisting

Ensure shortlists have broader market awareness.

5

Before Lock-In

Reduce regret before contracts are signed.

Impact

What This Changes in Practice

Decisions informed by market reality
Higher quality evaluation shortlists
Preserved architectural flexibility
Reduced lock-in risks

LTAD 2.0 does not slow decision-making.

It makes decisions safer, clearer, and easier to defend.

05

The Outcomes

Decision Leverage, Not Just Visibility

How LTAD 2.0 Changes Decision Outcomes

Cost

Reduction

Speed

Improvement

Risk

Mitigation

LTAD 2.0 is designed to reduce uncertainty at the point where Data & AI decisions carry the highest long-term impact. By expanding market visibility early, it delivers measurable advantages.

The Core Outcomes

Speed
1

Shorter Discovery Cycles

Reduce time spent searching, comparing, and validating tools by starting with a curated, relevant view of the global market.

Visibility
2

No Market Blind Spots

Surface the 80–90% of niche, high-quality tools that typically never reach enterprise evaluation.

Quality
3

Better Shortlists

Improve shortlist relevance by including right-fit solutions, enabling real comparison and trade-off analysis.

Cost
4

Lower Long-Term Cost

Avoid overpaying for underutilized platforms by identifying solutions designed for specific capabilities.

Flexibility
5

Preserved Flexibility

Reduce lock-in risk by understanding alternative patterns and options early, when change is still inexpensive.

Net Effect
Better-informed decisions
Reduced post-commitment regret
Clearer leadership justification

LTAD 2.0 doesn't push enterprises toward niche tools.

It ensures they see them before deciding whether they matter.

06

Why Trust Us

Why LTAD 2.0 Is Trustworthy

This Isn't a Hypothesis. It's a Mapped Reality

35+

Countries

Global Reach

100s

Tools Tracked

Mapped Landscape

10K+

Practitioners

Community Reach

LTAD 2.0 is built on continuous exposure to how Data & AI tools are being built, positioned, adopted, and evaluated across industries and regions.

This visibility comes from active engagement with the global Data & AI ecosystem, not secondary research or vendor submissions.

What Grounds LTAD 2.0 in Reality

Global
1

Global Market Exposure

Through ongoing collaboration with practitioners, founders, and decision-makers across 35+ countries, we maintain real-time awareness of emerging tools, patterns, and gaps.

Mapped
2

Mapped Tool Landscape

Hundreds of niche, high-quality Data & AI tools have been tracked and categorized, providing a structured view of capabilities that rarely reach enterprise shortlists.

Practitioner
3

Practitioner-Led Insight

Insights are shaped through direct conversations with builders and operators via Let's Talk About Data!, not filtered through marketing narratives.

Community
4

Community Signal Quality

With a reach spanning tens of thousands of practitioners and leaders, LTAD 2.0 benefits from continuous feedback, validation, and pattern recognition.

Neutrality

What This Means for Enterprises

LTAD 2.0 is not driven by vendor promotion or sponsorship.

It exists to improve decision quality by expanding visibility at the moment when choices still matter.

That neutrality is what makes it valuable.

Ready to See More?

See the Full Market, Before Decisions Are Locked In

If your organization is approaching a major Data & AI decision (platform selection, architecture design, vendor shortlisting, or long-term contracts), LTAD 2.0 helps ensure those decisions are made with clarity, context, and full market awareness.

Use LTAD 2.0 before commitment, when flexibility still exists and regret is still avoidable.

Get in Touch

A platform initiative by Your Partner Technologies.